Camera 500D - Its A Step In The Right Direction

I consider myself to be more of a technophilewould always recomending getting either image
then photographer. Every year I seem to pick upstabilized camera body such as the Olympus or
a new camera as the manufacturers addmake sure you are getting the Canon IS lenses
megapixels, more zoom, video, HD video, etc... toand not the ones without. It really does make a
what I bought the year before at the same pricebig difference in what you can do with the
point. I've picked up enough photography skillscamera as a novice or amateur photographer.)
through out the years just playing with my newAs a still camera the Camera 500D is an excellent
toys every year to have a moderatechoice especially if you are getting your first
understanding of photography by now. CamerasDSLR. If still pics alone are your primary concern
are also utilized for part of my job wherethough I would say you can get a less expensive
resoulution, zoom, and ability to get quickly onDSLR such as the Xsi or E-620 and spend
target is important. The advances in technologydifference in price on better lenses. The Camera
just in the last 3-4 years are amazing in what you500D is the same price as I paid for my E-510,
can do with a small camera and the price you paythe two kits lenses it came with, and the
to do it.70-300mm zoom lens. I know that some of the
That being said the Camera 500D was my choicedifferences I mentioned above are due in part to
this year for my upgrade. (Last year was thethe 2 model year difference in cameras and that
Olympus E-510 which I got a great deal on as athose differences would be lessened in the less
year old model and the year before that aexpensive current model year cameras.
panasonic FZ18). Having the option to shoot bothVideo however was one of the biggest reasons I
pics and video has been a big benefit for me atwent with the Camera 500D. There are just
work and when shooting at home. The FZ18 is stillsome moments that are nice to capture with
my work staple although the now two yearsvideo and audio rather then just still pics alone.
newer FZ35 is looking tempting. As far as whatThat you can now have the ability to do that in a
the panasonic bridge cameras can do in goodlimited way, while getting DSLR quality stills is
outdoor lighting, it is very similar to what either ofgreat. Carrying one camera is better then carrying
my DSLR's can do, and I would say the sametwo to do the same thing. I would rate the
thing for zooming outdoors. If you are looking forCamera 500D's video as OK for what it is.
a great walk around outdoor camera to takeIndoors it does shoot with lower noise then a
daylight pics and video with I would recommendsmaller sensored camera would, but the lack of
the panasonic series handsdown and you willlighting indoors still hurts it as it does all video
come out several hundreds of dollars ahead. Thecameras. I am not sure if a Canon camcorder hot
upper level superzoom bridge cameras now haveshoe light would work on the Camera 500D or
many of the manual functions the DSLR's do andnot. If it did I would give Canon props. Outdoors in
do some nice burst shooting as well. Panasonicgood light it does better. Where the DSLR gives
video is decent.you a lot of variety in how you shoot still pics it is
What a DSLR will give you is much better indoor,limited in being able to do the same thing right
portrait, and lowlight shooting. It also allows you tonow with video.
better implement and use advanced skills. TheA dedicated HD camcorder will still serve you
trade off being the higher price of the body,better for taking shots of scenes in which the
larger size of the body/lens, high priced lens,focus and range rapidly change and where you
flashes, etc.... No DSLR accessory is cheap. Theneed to shoot long sessions at one time. The
DSLR will also require you to better understandCamera 500D is not designed to shoot video for
photography and especially depth of field, shutterextended periods due to the generation of heat
speeds, etc...which degrades image quality and per the manual
The Camera 500D is a nice camera with awill likely give you an overheating warning after
beautiful screen and easy to understand menu.about an hour or so of extended use and I think
The kit lens I would say is just OK. The buildmay shut the camera down. (I think the same
quality of the camera body (based on feel in thething would happen if you set up the camera in
hand, heft, and visual inspection) seems betterlive view mode for that long as well). So setting it
then the entry level Nikons and Canon XS, butup on a tripod to record say your kids basketball
my E-510 seems to be a more solidly built unit.game is not what it is capable of doing. If you are
Ditto for the kit lenses with neither brand of kitlike me though and find that most video you
lens being all that great, but I think the Olympusshoot of everyday events is only a few minutes
lenses take better pictures. However more lenslong at most, this will work. I have been using the
options exist for the Canon both from Canon and720p video most of the time as the 1080 doesn't
third party sources. As Amazon had a goodhandle motion well. I also found that a class 6 card
package price at the time I purchased theor better (again as the manual states) is a
Camera 500D, I also picked up the 55-250mm ISrequirement for good 720p video. (a class 4 will
lens, which I prefer over the kit offering. (I alsowork, but you will notice dropped frames and
have the basic 70-300mm Olympus lens which isartifacts from its inabilty to keep up with the flow
similar in price to the Canon 55-250mm, and againof data. The class 4 works for still shooting just
appears to have a better build in the same pricefine although it may lessen some lengthy burst
range.)shooting).
Indoors the Canon has a better ISO range thenI gave this camera 5 stars because you really do
the E-510, but both take pictures that look veryget a lot for what you pay. Yes it has limitations
detailed and there is little if any noticeablein the video mode but when you think about what
difference betwen them quality wise in goodyou get for around $750 in this unit vs. what the
indoor lighting or using the flash. Outdoors in lowsame amount of money would have gotten you
lighting the Canon beats the Oly. The Canon alsojust 2-3 years ago I think it is a great camera. It
has a better autofocus system and focusestakes excellent still pics, and OK HD video. If you
better in low light. At zoom ranges I think the 5have a DSLR that is 2-3 years old and are
megapixel difference is noticeable as the Canonprimarily interested in still pics, I won't say I would
with lens at 250mm resolves the same level ofupgrade. And like I said above, even if this is your
detail when fully zoomed as the Olympus doesfirst camera and don't care about video there are
with the fully zoomed 300mm (basically a 400mmless expensive choices for getting great still pics.
equivalent zoom vs. a 600mm, so I think that isIf it is your first DSLR and you do want the
impressive.) Both give you a better picture thenoption to do some videos (same with upgraders)
the FZ18 when you hit the shot, but I think thethere isn't anything better out there right now and
auto mode for the bridge camera gives novicethis is definetly the way to go. Torn between this
shooters more consistent results then the DSLR's.and an HD camcorder that will take still pics I
Part of that may be when you get a good DSLRwould say that the video the Camera 500D
pic you really know it, and when you are just ashoots (with-in its limits) is a much better
little off it is easy to see it is missing that DSLRsecondary option then the still photos a
"pop". Those up close or zoomed "potraits" iscamcorder takes. I have taken a nice HD
where even a very new photographer will realycamcorder on a trip before and relied on its still
notice the difference when stepping up to apics and would have liked to have had what the
DSLR. That and the lack of picture noise due toCamera 500D offers over that, even when
the larger sensor. (If this is a family cameraconsidering the larger size of Camera 500D.
purchase and you plan on rarely using a tripod, I