| Since the early days of digital photography, I use | | | | system, ie, body image stabilization with the kit |
| mainly include electronic devices. Although the | | | | lens 18-55mm. |
| picture quality in the initial period as compared to | | | | Quite amazing in my eyes the noise performance, |
| analog photography was pretty gruesome, so the | | | | image stabilization and the detailing of the camera |
| direct availability, direct editing weighed, the direct | | | | in poor, low-light conditions. I've shot in street |
| print mE In most cases, the disadvantages of the | | | | lighting, clear photos of moving objects are not |
| lack of quality. | | | | from the hand to ISO 1600. Super. |
| For the cases of truly challenging photography I | | | | Here the noise behavior of the camera is really |
| took my two analog SLR to date: a Rolleiflex and | | | | very good. Both RAW as well as in JPEG Fine. |
| a Minolta. | | | | Indoors, I leave the flash off and the images are |
| The Canon EOS 500D is my first digital SLR. A | | | | generally 1A. |
| gift of the family on the recommendation of a | | | | Enables you to pinpoint the flash of a face against |
| photo retailer. | | | | a light background, for example, add, control the |
| The initial experience. | | | | camera performs a really great job: The images |
| Focus and speed: Automatic, fast, accurate in all | | | | are not "flash is dead" but really brightened only |
| available modes. In any case, this is true with the | | | | by the relevant authorities. The rest, of course, |
| supplied kit lens 18-55mm IS. In focus-tracking is | | | | remains. |
| still accurate, and also for movement-images | | | | The level of detail is extremely high, though many |
| quickly enough. | | | | details are available, which differ in color. BUT: In |
| Manual focus of course, also works. But why? | | | | contrast to low light conditions, the texture |
| Exposure and focus can be set to spot or | | | | behavior in the sunshine in JPEG mode is |
| evaluative. This is sufficient for practice. | | | | improved. Regardless of whether program, |
| Handling: This material is OK. The camera seems | | | | aperture or aperture priority and even in purely |
| robust and stable. Only in comparison with the | | | | manual recording level> the texture behavior, and |
| magnesium-Teddy from Nikon, Canon, Pentax, | | | | also the highlight of treatment are not optimal. |
| Olympus is seen and felt it better. | | | | Texture says: The surface treatment. Here for |
| The camera is great for my hands not the | | | | example is from my white shepherd dog in the |
| optimum, but it can still work well with it. The | | | | snow in sunlight, sometimes even a white mass |
| "low" weight has advantages and disadvantages. | | | | with two button issues, and I quite a lot of |
| The balance is thus more in the direction of the | | | | aperture, time, white balance, etc. I experimented. |
| lens, you have to carry less. Stabilization by hand | | | | DAS may also have a good compact better. This |
| is not sufficient given. Anyone who comes from a | | | | could be, as is the dynamic behavior at high |
| compact camera, and has never worked with an | | | | dynamic range of the recording in JPEG mode, |
| SLR, will find the camera but as a very high | | | | with a firmware adjustment mE be improved. |
| quality and very large. | | | | All in all, the Camera 500D, but a very good, fast |
| All buttons and controls open up after a short | | | | camera with excellent picture quality in almost any |
| acclimation. The monitor is of excellent quality. | | | | lighting condition, which dedicated amateur |
| However, the monitor I use only for movies and | | | | photographers offers everything they need when |
| for settings. In the pure photography mode, I | | | | they do not want to shoot in the rain or the |
| shut it off permanently, because I'm used to at | | | | Sahara. The image quality in RAW mode is |
| first, use the viewfinder of an SLR, and second is | | | | probably just as well as in the two-digit and |
| the Live View focusing a slow wit. | | | | APS-C models from Nikon and Canon. |
| What exactly is this live-view? In my view, a pure | | | | I do not know yet whether I'll keep it. If I had |
| marketing gimmick for people who come from | | | | picked myself a DSLR and would not get this as a |
| digital compact cameras. The viewfinder is much | | | | gift, it would probably become a Pentax K-7th |
| faster and the first images the way you want | | | | Why? |
| them and how you see them. | | | | I once had with a Rolleiflex in the Sahara. After |
| I use the movie mode in the 720p version. Give | | | | the repair and cleaning was almost as expensive |
| me perfect, and the results are reproduced at 30 | | | | as the camera itself. A water-and dust-tight |
| frames per second, also in a liquid. Unlike others, I | | | | enclosure is m.E. worth a lot and for a reasonable |
| find the video function is very nice and helpful. | | | | price, offers, in conjunction with a magnesium |
| Here you MUST use the Monitor Incidentally, since, | | | | body and video recording, only the Pentax. > How |
| because the mirror pops up, the viewfinder | | | | Will see. For, from this level of photography, the |
| remains black. | | | | EOS 500D back in the digital compact class level |
| For the main point: How are the pictures? | | | | now also even () anymore. |
| I can only write something about the standard | | | | Check for Low Price Now!... |